Principle XII. The era of the Mashiach quotes many requirements of the Messiah; one of which is absolutely false where it claims that he would, not only have the seed of King David, but the seed of King Solomon. (that is posted below my own objection)

I dispute this portion, vigorously!

Because King Solomon, who was given the Gift of Wisdom, as he had requested from the Lord Yahuah, lacked the personal wisdom for himself and his walk with the God of His Father Jacob, he married and took as concubines at least a thousand, of which, were serving pagan gods. Not only did he marry outside his Hebrew lineage, he built pagan temples for his wives. But not only that, did he do but he began to worship those gods; participating in grotesque acts which must have broken the heart of the Great I Am. Because of these sins, the ruling line was taken away from Solomon's seed and given to another of David's son, Nathan. It seem to me that this paragraph is sneaking in a complete falsehood which will allow an off-spring of the Seed of Satan to occupy the throne in Jerusalem.

Solomon was the Third Legitimate King under a united Israel and upon his death, Israel split into the Northern half called Israel and the Southern half remained Judah. All in all, the Northern Kingdom had unlawful kings that continue to follow the sins of Solomon, building their own grand temple so they would not have to travel to Jerusalem to fulfill the Feasts and installing their own High Priest. Those would be the very ones called The Synagogue of Satan which was referred to by Yeshua Himself as being Vipers (serpents). Within 40 years of that time, Judah was also dispersed for following after the ways of his brothers of the North.

Bottom line: these Northern tribes called Israel, will produce the Anti-Christ. Dan was of that Northern Kingdom that crossed over to Europe.

Here is the proof of that lineage of Messiah. Although Joseph was a step-father, the kingly lineage came from the male side so he was of the lineage of Nathan. Mary, the earthly mother needed to bring forth Yeshua, was also of the lineage of Nathan, NOT SOLOMON.

And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli, ... Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David.... (Luke 3:23,31)

Does it really matter which lineage? Absolutely. So important was it to establish the legality of Jesus and His claim to be the Messiah that Matthew lists the genealogy of Jesus on the Father's side. Without that legal claim, Jesus could not fulfill prophecy that said Messiah would be a descendant of Abraham (Gen. 12:3, 22:18, Gal. 3:16) and David (2 Sam. 7:12-19, Jer. 23:5)

God knew that the Jews, the hard-heads that they were, would need proof of that claim according to Jewish Law, therefore God provided a father who, not only had these credentials but who was also willing to be a loving parent to Mary's first born.

In the Gospel of Luke, the genealogy is listed differently. There all the men on Mary's side, which also go back to King David and Abraham are listed. This listing gives the bloodlines of priests from Levi.

Jeshua HaMashiach qualified for both High Priest and King of Israel. No longer is there a High Priest needed, nor the sacrifices since He was also the Perfect Lamb of God. He finished it. Thus any man who ascends Israel's throne claiming to be of the lineage of King David through King Solomon and of the Tribe of Judah demanding to be worshipped as their Messiah will very quickly be rejected by the True Jews. They will see through the farce and refuse to bow to his authority. I believe those days are not far away in the future.

No matter how the Rabbinical Council, called the Sanhedrin, now re-established in Tiberias since 2004 after losing it's power in the Land since it was disbanded in 70AD, may try to weave a false thread around these two qualifications, only Yeshua HaMashiach is able to fulfill it all.

Interesting also to the times that we are in was the establishment of a Sanhedrin again in 2004, just like it was in the days of Jesus.

For further proof of the correct Seed of which came the lineage for King was not Solomon but of Nathan look:

http://www.tedmontgomery.com/bblovrvw/emails/JesusDavidSolomon.html

gerlinda

FOR FAIR USE EDUCATION AND DISCUSSION PURPOSES




Maimonides codifies this in Principle number twelve of his thirteen principles:

Principle XII. The era of the Mashiach

And this is to believe that in truth that he will come and that you should be waiting for him even though he delays in coming. And you should not calculate times for him to come, or to look in the verses of Tanakh to see when he should come. The sages say: The wisdom of those who calculate times [of his coming] is small and that you should believe that he will be greater and more honored than all of the kings of Israel since the beginning of time as it is prophesied by all the prophets from Moses our teacher, peace be upon him, until Malachi, peace be upon him. And he who doubts or diminishes the greatness of the Mashiach is a denier in all the Torah for it testifies to the Mashiach explicitly in the portion of Bilaam and the portion of “You are gathered (towards the end of Deut)”. And part of this principle that there is no king of Israel except from the house of David and from the seed of Solomon alone. And anyone who disputes this regarding this family is a denier of the name of God and in all the words of the prophets.

Let us look today for Mashiach, and let His Majesty explain how the words of Chazal are reconciled at His coming, Amen V’Amen!

Hi Gerlinda!

I really liked your study!! I was just thinking today how King Soloman was the perfect example of the elect that fall away into apostasy. No one was richer or wiser and yet in his later days he fell into horrible apostasy and worshiped false gods. Yet, he is the bloodline of the Illuminate, and the Lord of the Masons.

I don't know if everyone knows this or not, but the only other time that the number 666 is mentioned in the Bible is in regards to King Soloman.


1Ki 10:14

"Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred threescore and six talents of gold,"

Was the Lord trying to tell us something by the use of this exact number, in regards to this apostate King? As you said, we shall soon see.

Again, your letter was extremely interesting, informative and timely. Thanks for sharing it!!

Agape!
Patti C.

Hi Patti,

You bet your scripture you provided and the questions you asked is some more powerful evidence that this man gave it all up. Many think he repented. In fact, I'm almost positive most people who call themselves Christians don't even consider that Solomon didn't end his life in the great way that he began; there seems to be no thought at all, eh? I don't know if he did but I think not since he spread his seed among the pagans women in his lust of them and polluted the very Godly, pure DNA that was to keep the Children of Israel separate from the pagans all around them. While Solomon was sowing his life-long oats among the pagan women, Satan managed his greatest job of expanding his kingdom of the off-springYes from one man alone to whom so much was given, I had read about that number of the gold that he received in one year coming to 666 and you are right, it sure does connect him to the Illuminati off-spring, of which he must have fathered in the hundreds. Isn't it kind of ironic that the Knights Templar stole the gold of Solomon Temple at it's destruction and believe it to be theirs in their quest to rebuilt their temple (very soon) in which the final A/C will demand worship. Thank you for this reminder below; it kind of seals the question about Solomon, doesn't it? gerlinda

1Ki 10:14

"Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred threescore and six talents of gold,"

Was the Lord trying to tell us something by the use of this exact number, in regards to this apostate King? As you said, we shall soon see.