Photo from:http://www.bibleinthenews.com/home/view_art.php?id_pag=338


"Fair Use for Discussion and Educational Purpose"
Jewlicious.Com
http://www.jewlicious.com/2012/03/lets-get-real-on-iran/


The cover of the latest Economist reads “Iran” in ominous black letters peppered with nuclear emblems, most of which, like Iran’s nuclear facilities, are depicted deep underground. Being dropped from above are two bombs, one emblazoned with Old Glory and the other with the Star of David. The imagery suggesting an American or Israeli pre-emptive strike could not be clearer. Neither could The Economist’s take on such prospects: “Why an attack will not eradicate the nuclear threat”.

The magazine sums up the views of many, particularly in Europe, who agree that Iran’s nuclear program must be halted but not through military means. While this is a reasonable stance, it must also be supported as such. And here The Economist falls short, relying on weak assumptions and citing evidence that belies their own conclusions.

“If Iran is intent on getting a bomb…” starts one paragraph. If? Let’s consider, in November of last year the IAEA released a report asserting that Iran is carrying out “activities that are relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device,” including “the acquisition of nuclear weapons development information and documentation from a clandestine nuclear supply network.” Does The Economist believe that Iran is willing to withstand ever crippling sanctions and international isolation for a theoretical research project, an academic exercise?

Even the Iranians have dropped this pretense. A high level strategic analysis published by the Iranian Defense Ministry in 2010 contends that in the event of an unconventional attack, “Iran needs to respond with a nuclear strategy.” In other words, it’s not if they want the bomb, it’s if they can attain one.

Even so, warns the Economist, military force against Iran’s nuclear facilities would be ill advised because “using Western bombs as a tool to prevent nuclear proliferation risks making Iran only more determined to build a weapon.” Essentially, don’t try to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons, otherwise Iran will want to develop nuclear weapons.

An attack will also prompt Iran to stop cooperating with the IAEA and move its nuclear production underground, warns the magazine. Except, this is already happening, and the authors acknowledge as much in the same issue. “In 2006 restarted its centrifuge programme, ended compliance with the additional protocol and turned a deaf ear to the IAEA’s questions about weaponisation. It continues to allow inspectors in, but, as this week, refuses them access to the things they demand to see.”

The suggested solution? Ratchet up sanctions and hope for a new government to forswear the bomb. But which government is The Economist waiting for? Nuclear development started under the pro-Western and secular shah of Iran, continued under the mullahs since 1979, supported by the former reformist President Rafsanjani, paraded by President Ahmadinejad, and duly blessed by his opponent from the Green Movement, Mir-Hossein Mousavi. Iranians of all backgrounds see nuclear development as a matter of national pride and every major political leader has reflected this sentiment.

All this is not to say that bombing Iran’s nuclear facilities is the right move. The magazine does raise important considerations as well, such as the probability of a success strike and the pace at which Iran can rebuild their program.

The potential costs may very well outweigh the benefits. But in making this analysis, let’s be frank about what we are dealing with. Iran wants the bomb, they’re actively developing one, and sanctions are unlikely to stop them.

David Bratslavsky analyzes US foreign policy and the Middle East. He studied politics, language and religion in Washington, D.C., Tel Aviv, Cairo and Jerusalem. Follow on Facebook and Twitter.

-------------------------------------------
From: Bible in the News.com http://www.bibleinthenews.com/home/view_art.php?id_pag=338

The moment of truth with Iran.
The front page of the Economist this week features the problem of the prospect of a nuclear armed Iran. The cover and the inside article suggest that an armed attack will not eradicate the nuclear threat.

The writer suggests that at best it would delay the nuclear program by ten years. Israel may see things differently. Ten years without a nuclear armed Iran would be very welcome. Things appear differently when you are the target. Again the situation has reached a crisis point and what will happen remains to be seen.

We do know however, that Iran will be with the King of the North at the time of the end. Russia's constant backing of Iran and Syria is exactly what a student of Bible prophecy would expect. In fact the current Iranian crisis, is dividing the Middle East more and more upon the lines described in Ezekiel 38.

A moment of truth for all of us.
These critical junctures for Israel indicate that there is a moment of truth coming, for all those who wait for the return of Christ - the Messiah - to the earth, to judge his saints and restore the kingdom in Israel. As we look at the Bible in the News and see the scene being prepared for the introduction of the great King of Israel onto the stage, we should all pause and consider our ways. So that when our moment of truth arrives we can hope for mercy in the eyes of the King.

---------------------------------------------

It's sad that the whole world is experienceing their "moments of truth" thru misery, anguish, and devastation.

The answer concerning Iran, Syria, and Israel will be according to God's plan. We surmize and think we know, but I'm sure we don't.

Our own nation hit with 77 Tornadoes over the weekend which set a new record for March! Untold damage!
And yet more devastation is in store for us, the Middle East, and every one on this planet BECAUSE,
Our GOD has a controvery with the NATIONS that is ONLY NOW speeding up!

Ezekiel 36:23 I will show the holiness of my great name, which has been profaned among the nations, the name you have profaned among them. Then the nations will know that I am the LORD, declares the Sovereign LORD, when I show myself holy through you before their eyes.

Many are still not getting the "Big" picture!
But we KNOW, because we love Him, He shows us THEIR END, and OUR BEGINNING....in Glory!

Please come Lord Jesus to Bless your Holy Name!
Maranatha! YSIC, Sally

----------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Rapture Bible Prophecy Forum, (http://www.rapturebibleprophecyforum.com ) does not necessarily endorse or agree with every opinion expressed in every article posted on this site. We do however, encourage a healthy and friendly debate on the issues of our day. Whether you agree or disagree, we encourage you to post your feedback by using the reply button