Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist
http://82.221.129.208/.wn3.html

Do not believe the lies about Notre Dame. NOTHING got wrecked. NOTHING AT ALL. No stained glass windows in the main portion of the cathedral were lost. No artifacts lost. The pipe organ did not get touched by anything, no smoke damage, no water damage, NOTHING. The cathedral survived so well it is as if the protection of God caused it, but going over what happened, supreme architecture and planning for such an event with the way it was built also obviously played a role in how well it made it.

They are claiming that it had to be stabilized after the fire to prevent it's collapse. THAT IS PURE BULL****, the only thing I can say about that is at least they are saying it is now stabilized so they did not 911 it with a little C4 after the "plane impact". Pope Francis is probably ******* Michelle Obama is definitely ******* and Macron is probably a flailing lunatic, trying to pump up public support for making it a mosque because "the damage was so bad the whole thing needs a rebuild" but it is such an obvious patent lie he probably won't get away with what was obviously his primary objective for burning it in the first place. GUESS WHAT: The computers in the fire control system were hacked to give false readings, JUST LIKE STUXNET. Gee, I wonder how that happened and who would have done that.??!!??

NOTRE DAME OBVIOUSLY GOT DAMAGED, BUT IT WAS SUCH SMALL DAMAGE CONSIDERING THE OBJECTIVE THAT IT AMOUNTED TO A WARNING SHOT. I AM OBVIOUSLY NOT HAPPY THE HISTORIC WOODEN ROOF IS GONE, HOWEVER THE BURNING OF NOTRE DAME WAS A FLATULENT SATANIC FAILURE THAT REALLY LOOKS LIKE GOD WAS MORE POWERFUL THAN THE SATANIC FORCES TAKING OVER WESTERN CIVILIZATION. IT REALLY LOOKS LIKE GOD SAID "HELL NO."

On that note, HAPPY EASTER!

CONFIRMED: Notre Dame was virtually unhurt by the fire, and any claims that it has to be "rebuilt" are hoaxes with a motive

The hoax of Notre Dame:

This hoax involved burning a wooden facade "roof" that probably kept water off a secondary roof and prevented freezing problems with the second roof, and NOTHING MORE. Unlike what you have been told by the scamming MSM, the cathedral would never have collapsed because the actual support for the cathedral was provided by the side arches, and the arches of an interior brick and concrete roof three feet thick. This secondary interior roof prevented damage to the inside of the cathedral, except where the spire (questionably, it likely had help) "fell through" it.

The hoax about the cathedral being "destroyed" is now confirmed. Let's get this party started

Here is how the wooden roof was attached. You can clearly see the concrete dome roof under it was supporting it, and now has less weight to hold with it gone and it would actually be less likely to collapse now provided the heat of the fire did not significantly damage it:

http://82.221.129.208/pages/notredamewood.jpg

Here is a picture of that burned wooden roof laying on top of the concrete and brick roof under it. Notre Dame was built a LOT better than anything the Romans ever did. With the Roman stuff, once the wooden roof was gone, all that remained was pillars. Clearly here, the real roof consisted of a series of concrete and brick domes.

Here's why the cathedral was, except for where the spire fell through, unscathed

http://82.221.129.208/pages/notredameconcrete.jpg

Entire story & more photos at: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=121863

Disclaimer: Rapture Bible Prophecy Forum, ( http://www.rapturebibleprophecyforum.com ) does not necessarily endorse or agree with every opinion expressed in every article posted on this site. We do however, encourage a healthy and friendly debate on the issues of our day. Whether you agree or disagree, we encourage you to post your feedback by using the reply button.