Cheap Web Site Hosting
Linix 64 bit operating system turn into a supercomputer .






Organization of VIII

THE CODE













"A QUANTUM BOMB"
by: netcrazy
A quantum bomb at such a magnitude that it collapse all dimensions
around us and is a infinite chain reaction every opposing reaction has
an unseen opposite reaction ( refraction )of light. Wave Length - Gravity -
Light - mass - Wave Lengths.( THEY ARE ALL INTERCHANGEABLE )"

Over the past century, physicists have unlocked the secrets behind
radio and television, nuclear energy and the power of the sun. Now
they're seeking the ultimate prize: a "theory of everything" that
could reveal a bizarre realm of inter dimensional wormholes and time
warps.

SUCH A THEORY would give us the ability to "read the mind of God,"
says Cambridge cosmologist Stephen Hawking. And in Hawking's opinion,
there's a 50-50 chance that someone will discover the Holy Grail of
physics within the next 20 years.

Beginning in the 1920s, a generation of scientists defined the
small scale universe as a collection of fuzzy phantoms. These
subatomic particles couldn't be precisely located in space and time,
but their interaction could be described in statistical terms.The
equations that describe the gravitational field are completely
different from those for electromagnetism and subatomic interactions.

But one bizarre approach is gaining popularity. It turns out that the
equations of quantum theory can mesh perfectly with the theory of
relativity. Now in the 2003 we know the quantum address of all matter in
our quantum tunnel.

This article is based on material from "Hyper space" and "Visions" by
Michio Kaku. 12-01-03 by tim liverance








He apparently emailed this to Art bell and Art read it on the air to Kakulast night and Kaku said it was stupid. "That doesn't make anysense," he said; when Art pressed him further, Kaku said "It's indefiance of the laws of physics."I was actually quite impressed by Kaku on last night's show. When hesticks to actual physics and the history of same, he seems quiteintelligent. He had some interesting things to say about nuclearreactor accidents and how they happened.
According to the physicists in
the USA and Austria who have come up with a new, improved
solution to this dastardly challenge of probing without
interacting, the answer is 'yes'. The 'superbomb' conundrum
above was posed in 1993, by physicists A. Elitzur and
L. Vaidman, to illustrate the problem of 'interaction-free'
measurements. It is a restatement of the old quantum-theory
chestnut: the observer and the observed are inextricably
linked. Elitzur and Vaidman proposed that, far from foiling
attempts at interaction-free measurement, quantum theory
makes them possible. Conventional thinking says that, if
you want to inspect the bombs, there's no option but to
bounce at least one photon off them. Yet according to
quantum theory, because light is both wave and particle,
a photon can have a ghostly influence on itself. A beam of
light that is split in two and then recombined by a system
of mirrors will generate interference effects - even if only
one photon passes through the apparatus at a time. Elitzur
and Vaidman showed that, because of this 'self-interference',
a primed superbomb could be detected with a one in two chance
even without the photon actually striking it. This is all
very well as far as it goes - but the option of being blown
up in half of the measurements is none too attractive.
Now Paul Kwiat from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in
New Mexico, and colleagues, have improved the odds from one
in two to almost one in four. As they explain in Physical
Review Letters(1) they have improved on Elitzur and Vaidman's
solution, with the help of another strange quantum-mechanical
effect: the 'quantum Zeno effect'. This trick is named after
Zeno, the Greek philosopher of the fourth century BC renowned
for his relish of paradoxes. His take on the 'measurement
problem' has entered folklore as the adage that 'a watched
pot never boils'. In the quantum world, this can acquire
some truth: in some situations, repeated measurements made
on a quantum system can prevent it from changing its state.
This is the quantum Zeno effect. It operates even if the
interaction between the probe and the system is extremely
weak. The interaction can then be inferred from the
invariance of the system. The effect holds even in the case
of vanishingly small interaction strengths, if the
measurements are made often enough. Now, Kwiat and
colleagues report that, with just six such measurements,
a single photon of laser light could detect a particular
quantum system